The Municipal District of Peace has released results from a recent public engagement session focused on nuclear energy and its potential in the Peace Region. Hosted by the Peace Region Energy Committee (PREC), the June 24 session drew participants from Grimshaw, Berwyn, Peace River, and surrounding municipalities, seeking insight into the proposed Peace River nuclear power project.
The session aimed to inform residents about nuclear energy, address concerns, and gather public opinion. Of the 19 attendees who completed the survey, most came eager to learn more about the specifics of the proposed project, along with its safety and environmental impacts, and general nuclear energy knowledge. Economic opportunities were also a key interest.
A majority said the session provided the information they were seeking, with several praising the expertise of speaker Dr. Neil Alexander. However, some expressed a desire for more balanced perspectives, particularly from experts in alternative energy and climate science.
“There was a lot of good information,” said one attendee, “but I’d like to hear more from credible alternative points of view.”
Others criticized the tone of the presentation, calling the speaker “too pro-nuclear” and “dismissive of renewables.”
Still, sentiment toward nuclear energy remained largely favorable. Most attendees were already supportive before the session, and said their views hadn’t changed—some even grew more positive. Several cited nuclear’s potential to provide stable, low-carbon energy and boost the regional economy.
When asked about future sessions, respondents supported continued engagement. Key topics they want addressed include water resource impacts, decommissioning plans, long-term economic benefits, local job creation, healthcare impacts, and cost implications for consumers.
“There’s still a lot of uncertainty around how this will actually benefit our region,” one participant noted. “We need more transparency and follow-up.”
Concerns about misinformation, the need for public clarity, and local representation also surfaced. Some attendees requested that the project consistently be branded under the Peace Region Energy Committee—highlighting a desire for regional identity over association with just Peace River.
Despite differing views, the feedback reflects a community that is deeply engaged and seeking answers.
“People are open to learning,” said another participant. “More in-person sessions and honest dialogue will help reduce fear and increase understanding.”
Of those surveyed, a good amount asked to be contacted for future updates on the topic.
The PREC plans to use this feedback to shape future outreach efforts and ensure residents remain informed as the project evolves.
Keith Hopper, Trending 55
